One of the predicted outcomes in the slippery slope argument against *** marriage is that it will lead to multiple-partner marriages. I don’t want to debate the logic of the slippery slope, as that has been hashed and rehashed. I am curious as to the secular benefits or drawbacks that would follow from allowing groups of more than 2 people to be counted as one marriage.

Get Married in India

• May 13, 2009 — How did marriage and women’s roles change from Colonial period to the Republican Period? (2)
• May 6, 2009 — What is marriage, and should spouses share their spouse with others? (5)
• May 5, 2009 — How likely is a marriage to last if the girl is 18 and the guy is 23 when they get married? (24)
• May 4, 2009 — What would happen if Marriage was treated like a business transaction? (6)
• May 4, 2009 — How many *** marriage ceremonies have been performed in Mass in Catholic Churches? (7)
• May 2, 2009 — What place does marriage have in the next decade? (5)
• April 29, 2009 — How does allowing *** marriage have anything to do with education? (14)
• April 29, 2009 — Is there any law against hermaphrodite marriage in the united states? (3)
• April 13, 2009 — Does Marriage and birth certificates attestation required to process dubai visit visa of wife and kid? (1)
• April 1, 2009 — When the institution of marriage goes down the tube, do men lose power? (12)