To answer your one line question though *********** marriage is just as normal as normal marriage. It’s been in practice long before America was founded and won’t stop anytime soon. Those who don’t embrace it will only find themselves lost in the times, regardless of which generation they belong to.

As for Gays….personally I disagree with same *** marriage. The very definition of marriage has changed because of it if you ask me. However to each his own I don’t hold anything against them. I would say that resorting to calling people bigots is a very immature way of getting your point across. You are no different than the people that belittle those homosexuals that would stand up for their marriage. I personally think you are intolerant of the rest of the world. I have a suggestion for ya though. From 1500-1800 when people wanted to escape persecution they left and headed west. You could leave yourself if you don’t like how things are. Maybe to a country that’s even less tolerant of your beliefs. You have no idea just how good you have it. Flaunting your freedoms and demanding more. You really need to let things go.

anything else is irrelevant social convention and up to personal definition and so legally invalid

Ultimately, gays just want to be recognized and recieve all the benefits that heterosexual couples receive. They don’t want to ruin your marriage. They don’t want to make laws making people marry animals.

No church has been forced to marry homosexuals. You can get a license in court. The issue was that they denied business for a commitment ceremony, not a marriage.

If you bring up the argument of children… you are might as well ban having children outside of marriage, because you’re saying the exact same thing.

The real thing is that the issue of gay-marriage is like the issue of *********** marriage. No one who is against *********** marriage was alright with the relationship, let alone the marriage. You’re against the relationship itself, that’s your problem and why you are a bigot.

You might as well make being *** illegal… which you can’t do, since *** of any type between two consenting adults is their own business.

If you don’t support *** marriage, don’t marry someone who is ***. If you’re neighbors were gay, how would it make any difference to you if they were married or not.

EDIT:

You’re the one who brought up the issue of child-raising. With saying…
“I don’t think two men could replace my mother …”
My whole point is, you are talking about the issues of a mother and father. When it’s not a requirement to have both, much less many people don’t.

“because It hasn’t been legalized nationwide yet”
You were talking about a commitment ceremony, which all they wanted to do was lease the land their church owned, which they do to hetero couples as well, the problem was they broke a law by denying them because they were ***. A Catholic church can refuse to marry someone of a different belief, no one is forcing ANY church to marry anyone.

“Your putting words in my mouth just the way you put artificial facts in your head”
You can’t tell me it’s okay for people to be *** and you simply don’t want them to be married. You’d be lying if you don’t approve of their relationship.

“Once again I did not suggest that you did”
And you could actually share what you think there instead of saying that’s not what you suggested, though whether two people are married or not doesn’t change how you live your life.

“and you are using the same argument muslims who believe in poligamy can use, I notice you ignore most of the post that refutes your Loving vs. Virginia argument”

Loving v. Virginia was deemed unconstitutional due to restriction on race. My point is that your religion does not make the laws of a secular nation. Just because your god doesn’t approve of something, doesn’t mean you’re going to impede on the rights of others. That’s exactly why slavery existed. It was okay, because we never gave them rights in the first place.

The rights of a minority should never be voted on by the majority.

“Fine, call it civil unions and not marriage, my marriage is between a man and a woman, and they are trying to ******* that”
Separate is not equal, we already know that. The real problem is that we are a secular nation, not a theocracy. Your religion doesn’t make our laws. That’s what you’re talking about when you say perversion. Maybe you just don’t want to drink from the same water fountain as gays, so you rather give them a separate water fountain.

“Christians are not considered minorities but Muslims are considered minorities, And once again you ignore how I pointed out that race and gender are not the same”

Race and gender are not the same, but sexism and racism are both bigotry. Christians are the majority by numbers, but as I said, the majority doesn’t get to make whatever laws they please to enforce on everyone else.

“So are boy scouts and girls scouts separate but equal as well? When I say pervert, I mean the dictionary definition of “to lead astray””

So suddenly your marriage is not special to you anymore because gays can marry too? And no, boy scouts and girl scouts are not equal, boy scouts don’t allow gays and atheists into their organization.

“That’s laughable, considering I never said that, and what would you know about drinking from a separate fountain?”

Just seems to me you think if you’re sharing something with people who you deem as less than yourself somehow ruins it for you.

I still bet you can’t honestly say it’s okay for someone to be gay, just not okay for them to marry.