Has Martin Rogers conceded to the Williams sisters boycott at Indian Wells as a benefit?

Discussion Corner — By NikhilBhide on June 6, 2004 at 11:38

Budda of OnThaMove Radio asked:

Excuse me if my question makes me sound perplexed over Martin Rogers recent blog comments or should I say end-note where he mentions the Indian Wells Boycott by Serena Williams as a benefit. This coming after his notorious blog to the contrary, I am in shock to see such a comment from the greatest salt thrower on earth.

The follow exerpt taken from Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:43 pm EDT
The Monday Slice: It’s gut-check time for Federer
By Martin Rogers (http://sports.yahoo.com/ten/blog/ten_experts)

THIS WEEK’S PREDICTIONS
The Miami tournament doesn’t end until April 5, but the Monday Slice likes its chances of continuing our winning streak. Mr. Nadal retains our faith after entering the winner’s circle for us last weekend, while Serena Williams must be a strong favorite as she returns from a minibreak thanks to her boycott of Indian Wells.

Oh my word!

Haters throw salt like rice at weddings…….be careful of the salt throwers.

Get Married in India

March 25, 2008 -- Planning For Your Honeymoon: Some Considerations (0)
June 7, 2007 -- Marriage By Proxy (0)

Tags: Benefit, Contrary, Federer, Shock, Sports Yahoo, Winning Streak

1 Comment

nikhilbhide-theweddingplanner.com says:

June 7, 2004 at 07:33

I can’t tell if you are serious or not… but

“Serena Williams must be a strong favorite as she returns from a minibreak thanks to her boycott of Indian Wells” = SARCASM

It is often hard to tell sarcasm when it’s typed, as typeface doesn’t emote very well.

And if your question is out of sarcasm, my answer is another perfect example of this.